⚡ Quick Summary
Glean has evolved from an enterprise search tool into a critical AI middleware layer, allowing businesses to integrate LLMs like GPT-4 and Claude with their proprietary data. By mirroring existing security protocols and using retrieval-augmented generation to ground responses, Glean addresses the primary enterprise concerns of data security and model hallucinations.
The modern enterprise is currently caught in a high-stakes "land grab" for artificial intelligence dominance. As giants like Microsoft, Google, and OpenAI race to occupy the user interface, a quieter but more fundamental battle is being waged in the infrastructure layer. Companies are no longer asking if they should use AI, but rather how they can deploy it without compromising security or losing control of their data.
Glean, originally known as a powerful enterprise search tool, has strategically pivoted to become the "connective tissue" of this new era. By positioning itself as the middleware layer beneath the chatbot interface, Glean aims to solve the primary friction point of corporate AI: the gap between generic large language models (LLMs) and the specific, highly regulated context of a private business.
In this evolving landscape, the value is shifting from the models themselves to the systems that feed them. Glean’s leadership argues that while frontier models are increasingly powerful, they remain "generic" until they are grounded in the unique workflows and proprietary knowledge of a specific organization. This realization has marked Glean as a critical player in the enterprise AI stack.
Model Capabilities & Ethics
Glean’s approach to model capabilities is rooted in the philosophy of "agnosticism." Unlike Microsoft Copilot, which is tethered to OpenAI’s ecosystem, or Google Gemini, which is locked into Workspace, Glean functions as an abstraction layer. This allows enterprises to toggle between various proprietary models like GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini, or even deploy open-source alternatives depending on the specific use case or cost requirements.
From an ethical and security standpoint, the primary concern for any enterprise is data leakage and unauthorized access. Glean addresses this through a system that respects existing enterprise security protocols. When a user queries the AI, the system does not simply search all company data; it mirrors the existing access rights defined in tools like Jira, Salesforce, and Slack. If an employee does not have permission to view a specific HR document, the AI will not include that document’s information in its response.
The ethical framework also extends to the "hallucination" problem, which is a deal-breaker for industries like finance and legal. Glean utilizes an architecture that grounds AI responses in internal company data. Instead of relying on the model's internal weights for facts, the system retrieves relevant snippets from verified internal documents and forces the model to generate responses based on that specific context. Every response is accompanied by citations, allowing users to audit the AI's output against the source material.
Furthermore, Glean’s governance layer ensures that data used for grounding is protected. By decoupling the reasoning engine (the LLM) from the knowledge base (the enterprise data), Glean provides a safety buffer that many vertically integrated solutions currently lack.
Core Functionality & Deep Dive
At its core, Glean operates as a sophisticated infrastructure layer that connects the various documents and activities within a company. While the user interface is the visible component—a window where users can ask questions—the real work happens in the background through over 100 deep integrations. These connectors index everything from Slack channels and GitHub repositories to legacy SharePoint sites and modern SaaS tools.
One of the most powerful mechanisms within Glean is its ability to understand "work context." The system doesn't just look for keywords; it understands which documents are most relevant to a specific team. This contextual awareness allows the AI to provide answers that are personalized to the user's role. For example, a developer asking about "onboarding" will receive links to technical documentation and environment setup guides, while a marketing hire will receive brand guidelines and campaign calendars.
The deep dive into Glean's functionality reveals three primary pillars:
- The Indexing Engine: A continuous crawler that maintains a real-time index of all enterprise data while respecting API rate limits and security protocols.
- The Retrieval Layer: A search system that allows the AI to find information based on semantic meaning rather than just exact word matches.
- The Agentic Framework: Beyond simple Q&A, Glean is evolving into an "agent" layer. It can perform actions across tools, such as summarizing a ticket and then drafting a corresponding update in a communication channel, effectively acting as a cross-platform automation engine.
This functionality addresses the "fragmentation tax" that plagues modern work. The average enterprise uses hundreds of SaaS applications, leading to data silos that human employees struggle to navigate. Glean’s middleware approach treats these silos as a single, unified brain, allowing the AI to synthesize information that would otherwise take hours of manual searching to compile.
Technical Challenges & Future Outlook
Despite its rapid growth, Glean faces significant technical and market challenges. The most pressing is the "latency-accuracy tradeoff." In a system that grounds AI in company data, the tool must search millions of documents, rank them, and then feed the top results to an LLM for processing—all within seconds. As enterprise data grows exponentially, maintaining this speed without sacrificing the quality of the retrieved context requires massive investments in database optimization.
Another challenge lies in the "interface wars." Microsoft and Google have the advantage of "bundling." If a user is already spending 90% of their day inside Outlook or Google Docs, the friction of moving to a third-party AI assistant like Glean might be too high. Glean’s counter-strategy is to embed its intelligence directly into those platforms via browser extensions and API integrations, but they remain at the mercy of the platform owners' policies.
The future outlook for Glean depends on its ability to maintain "platform neutrality." Much like the debates surrounding third-party AI integration and the push for open ecosystems, enterprises are increasingly wary of vendor lock-in. If Glean can prove that a neutral, cross-platform layer is more effective than the siloed AI offered by individual SaaS vendors, it could become the "operating system" for the AI-powered workplace.
Looking ahead to 2026 and beyond, we expect Glean to lean more heavily into "Agentic Workflows." This involves moving from a passive search tool to an active participant that can predict what information a user needs before they even ask. For instance, if a user joins a new meeting, Glean could automatically surface the last three relevant documents, the previous meeting's summary, and the outstanding action items for the participants involved.
| Feature Category | Glean (Middleware Approach) | Microsoft Copilot (Bundled Approach) |
|---|---|---|
| Model Agnosticism | High (Supports GPT, Claude, Gemini, Llama) | Low (Locked to OpenAI/Azure models) |
| Data Connectivity | Cross-Platform (100+ SaaS integrations) | Ecosystem-Centric (Primarily Office 365) |
| Permissions Model | Respects source application access levels | Integrated with Entra ID (Active Directory) |
| Search Accuracy | Semantic search across all connected silos | Strong within Office; limited in external SaaS |
| Implementation | Requires setup of connectors and indexing | Native "flip-a-switch" for O365 users |
Expert Verdict & Future Implications
Glean’s primary strength lies in its recognition that "AI is only as good as the data it can see." By focusing on the "layer beneath the interface," they have built a moat that is difficult for pure-play LLM companies to cross. The market's interest in Glean is a testament to the belief that enterprise AI is a data problem, not just a modeling problem. The ability to provide a "single source of truth" across a fragmented software stack is a value proposition that resonates deeply with CTOs and CIOs.
However, the "cons" are equally notable. Glean is fighting a war on two fronts: against the foundation model providers (who are building their own enterprise versions) and the SaaS giants (who are building their own native AI). To survive, Glean must remain significantly better at search and retrieval than the "good enough" free tools bundled with existing software. Their focus on governance and citations is a strong differentiator, but the pricing pressure from bundled solutions will be relentless.
The market impact of Glean’s success will likely be the rise of the "AI Middleware" category. We are moving away from the era of "one AI to rule them all" and toward an era of "orchestration." In this future, specialized layers will handle data retrieval, security, and model routing, while the user interacts with whatever interface is most convenient at that moment. Glean is currently the frontrunner to own that orchestration layer.
🚀 Recommended Reading:
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Glean use my company data to train public AI models?
No. Glean uses an approach where your data is used only as context for the model to generate a specific answer. The data remains within your secure enterprise perimeter and is never used to train or fine-tune the foundation models of third-party providers.
How does Glean handle different user permissions across apps?
Glean respects the existing permissions of your connected applications. If a user does not have access to a specific folder in Google Drive or a private channel in Slack, the system will not be able to retrieve information from those sources when answering that specific user's questions.
Can Glean work with custom or on-premise AI models?
Yes. Glean is designed to be model-agnostic. While it comes with pre-configured access to leading proprietary models, its architecture allows enterprises to connect to various LLMs, including open-source models hosted on-premise or in private clouds, ensuring maximum flexibility and data sovereignty.